Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 84
Filter
1.
Sci Transl Med ; 16(743): eadi0077, 2024 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630848

ABSTRACT

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is an idiopathic form of pregnancy-induced heart failure associated with preeclampsia. Circulating factors in late pregnancy are thought to contribute to both diseases, suggesting a common underlying pathophysiological process. However, what drives this process remains unclear. Using serum proteomics, we identified the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), a marker of cellular senescence associated with biological aging, as the most highly up-regulated pathway in young women with PPCM or preeclampsia. Placentas from women with preeclampsia displayed multiple markers of amplified senescence and tissue aging, as well as overall increased gene expression of 28 circulating proteins that contributed to SASP pathway enrichment in serum samples from patients with preeclampsia or PPCM. The most highly expressed placental SASP factor, activin A, was associated with cardiac dysfunction or heart failure severity in women with preeclampsia or PPCM. In a murine model of PPCM induced by cardiomyocyte-specific deletion of the gene encoding peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α, inhibiting activin A signaling in the early postpartum period with a monoclonal antibody to the activin type II receptor improved heart function. In addition, attenuating placental senescence with the senolytic compound fisetin in late pregnancy improved cardiac function in these animals. These findings link senescence biology to cardiac dysfunction in pregnancy and help to elucidate the pathogenesis underlying cardiovascular diseases of pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies , Heart Diseases , Heart Failure , Pre-Eclampsia , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Mice , Animals , Peripartum Period , Placenta , Transcription Factors
2.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol ; 7(4): 1033-1041, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35942422

ABSTRACT

Objective: Airborne spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains a significant risk for healthcare workers. Understanding transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the hospital could help minimize nosocomial infection. The objective of this pilot study was to measure aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2 in the hospital rooms of COVID-19 patients. Methods: Two air samplers (Inspirotec) were placed 1 and 4 m away from adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalized at an urban, academic tertiary care center from June to October 2020. Airborne SARS-CoV-2 concentration was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and analyzed by clinical parameters and patient demographics. Results: Thirteen patients with COVID-19 (eight females [61.5%], median age: 57 years old, range 25-82) presented with shortness of breath (100%), cough (38.5%) and fever (15.4%). Respiratory therapy during air sampling varied: mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube (n = 3), high flow nasal cannula (n = 4), nasal cannula (n = 4), respiratory helmet (n = 1), and room air (n = 1). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was identified in rooms of three out of three intubated patients compared with one out of 10 of the non-intubated patients (p = .014). Airborne SARS-CoV-2 tended to decrease with distance (1 vs. 4 m) in rooms of intubated patients. Conclusions: Hospital rooms of intubated patients had higher levels of aerosolized SARS-CoV-2, consistent with increased aerosolization of virus in patients with severe disease or treatment with positive pressure ventilation through an endotracheal tube. While preliminary, these data have safety implications for health care workers and design of protective measures in the hospital. Level of Evidence: 2.

3.
J Educ Perioper Med ; 24(1): E681, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35707013

ABSTRACT

Background: Residency recruitment requires significant resources for both applicants and residency programs. Virtual interviews offer a way to reduce the time and costs required during the residency interview process. This prospective study investigated how virtual interviews affected scoring of anesthesiology residency applicants and whether this effect differed from in-person interview historical controls. Methods: Between November 2020 and January 2021, recruitment members at the University of Chicago scored applicants before their interview based upon written application materials alone (preinterview score). Applicants received a second score after their virtual interview (postinterview score). Recruitment members were queried regarding the most important factor affecting the preinterview score as well as the effect of certain specified applicant interview characteristics on the postinterview score. Previously published historical controls were used for comparison to in-person recruitment the year prior from the same institution. Results: Eight hundred and sixteen virtual interviews involving 272 applicants and 19 faculty members were conducted. The postinterview score was higher than the preinterview score (4.06 versus 3.98, P value of <.0001). The change in scores after virtual interviews did not differ from that after in-person interviews conducted the previous year (P = .378). The effect of each characteristic on score change due to the interview did not differ between in-person and virtual interviews (all P values >.05). The factor identified by faculty as the most important in the preinterview score was academic achievements (64%), and faculty identified the most important interview characteristic to be personality (72%). Conclusions: Virtual interviews led to a significant change in scoring of residency applicants, and the magnitude of this change was similar compared with in-person interviews. Further studies should elaborate on the effect of virtual recruitment on residency programs and applicants.

4.
Anesth Analg ; 135(5): 929-940, 2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35213469

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pharmacogenomics, which offers a potential means by which to inform prescribing and avoid adverse drug reactions, has gained increasing consideration in other medical settings but has not been broadly evaluated during perioperative care. METHODS: The Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Decision Support in Surgery (ImPreSS) Trial is a prospective, single-center study consisting of a prerandomization pilot and a subsequent randomized phase. We describe findings from the pilot period. Patients planning elective surgeries were genotyped with pharmacogenomic results, and decision support was made available to anesthesia providers in advance of surgery. Pharmacogenomic result access and prescribing records were analyzed. Surveys (Likert-scale) were administered to providers to understand utilization barriers. RESULTS: Of eligible anesthesiology providers, 166 of 211 (79%) enrolled. A total of 71 patients underwent genotyping and surgery (median, 62 years; 55% female; average American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, 2.6; 58 inpatients and 13 ambulatories). No patients required postoperative intensive care or pain consultations. At least 1 provider accessed pharmacogenomic results before or during 41 of 71 surgeries (58%). Faculty were more likely to access results (78%) compared to house staff (41%; P = .003) and midlevel practitioners (15%) ( P < .0001). Notably, all administered intraoperative medications had favorable genomic results with the exception of succinylcholine administration to 1 patient with genomically increased risk for prolonged apnea (without adverse outcome). Considering composite prescribing in preoperative, recovery, throughout hospitalization, and at discharge, each patient was prescribed a median of 35 (range 15-83) total medications, 7 (range 1-22) of which had annotated pharmacogenomic results. Of 2371 prescribing events, 5 genomically high-risk medications were administered (all tramadol or omeprazole; with 2 of 5 pharmacogenomic results accessed), and 100 genomically cautionary mediations were administered (hydralazine, oxycodone, and pantoprazole; 61% rate of accessing results). Providers reported that although results were generally easy to access and understand, the most common reason for not considering results was because remembering to access pharmacogenomic information was not yet a part of their normal clinical workflow. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot data for result access rates suggest interest in pharmacogenomics by anesthesia providers, even if opportunities to alter prescribing in response to high-risk genotypes were infrequent. This pilot phase has also uncovered unique considerations for implementing pharmacogenomic information in the perioperative care setting, and new strategies including adding the involvement of surgery teams, targeting patients likely to need intensive care and dedicated pain care, and embedding pharmacists within rounding models will be incorporated in the follow-on randomized phase to increase engagement and likelihood of affecting prescribing decisions and clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Pharmacogenetics , Tramadol , Humans , Female , Male , Pharmacogenetics/methods , Prospective Studies , Oxycodone , Pantoprazole , Succinylcholine , Perioperative Care , Pain , Hydralazine , Omeprazole
5.
Cells ; 11(4)2022 02 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35203391

ABSTRACT

Mediators of cardiac injury in preeclampsia are not well understood. Preeclamptic women have decreased cardiac global longitudinal strain (GLS), a sensitive measure of systolic function that indicates fibrosis and tissue injury. GLS is worse in preeclampsia compared to gestational hypertension, despite comparable blood pressure, suggesting that placental factors may be involved. We previously showed that Activin A, a pro-fibrotic factor produced in excess by the placenta in preeclampsia, predicts impaired GLS postpartum. Here, we hypothesized that chronic excess levels of Activin A during pregnancy induces cardiac dysfunction. Rats were assigned to sham or activin A infusion (1.25-6 µg/day) on a gestational day (GD) 14 (n = 6-10/group). All animals underwent blood pressure measurement and comprehensive echocardiography followed by euthanasia and the collection of tissue samples on GD 19. Increased circulating activin A (sham: 0.59 ± 0.05 ng/mL, 6 µg/day: 2.8 ± 0.41 ng/mL, p < 0.01) was associated with impaired GLS (Sham: -22.1 ± 0.8%, 6 µg/day: -14.7 ± 1.14%, p < 0.01). Activin A infusion (6 µg/day) increased beta-myosin heavy chain expression in heart tissue, indicating cardiac injury. In summary, our findings indicate that increasing levels of activin A during pregnancy induces cardiac dysfunction and supports the concept that activin A may serve as a possible mediator of PE-induced cardiac dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Activins , Heart Diseases , Pre-Eclampsia , Activins/blood , Animals , Female , Heart Diseases/etiology , Humans , Placenta , Pre-Eclampsia/pathology , Pregnancy , Rats
6.
Innovations (Phila) ; 17(1): 50-55, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35225062

ABSTRACT

Objective: Robotic totally endoscopic coronary bypass (R-TECAB) has been shown to be a safe and effective technique with excellent outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of R-TECAB in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and to report our midterm outcomes with up to 7-year follow-up. Methods: All patients undergoing R-TECAB at our institution between July 2013 and July 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 100 patients were identified with low LVEF defined as ≤40%. The preoperative characteristics, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, as well as the midterm results were reviewed. Results: The mean LVEF was 31%, and 62% of all patients had preexisting congestive heart failure. Of the cohort, 59% had 3-vessel disease and 6% underwent previous cardiac surgery. Multivessel TECAB was performed in 54%. Hybrid coronary revascularization occurred in 36 individuals. Two patients required cardiopulmonary bypass, and 35% were extubated in the operating room. No sternotomy conversions were required. One patient underwent reoperation for bleeding. No perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, or mortality occurred. The left internal mammary artery graft patency was 97% at a mean of 1.6 months in the staged hybrid percutaneous coronary intervention group. At midterm follow-up the cardiac-related mortality was 5%. Heart transplant or left ventricular assist device was required in 4 patients, and 1 patient experienced a myocardial infarction. Freedom from major adverse cardiac events was 89%. Conclusions: Off-pump TECAB can be successfully performed in patients with low LVEF in the setting of an experienced and dedicated robotic cardiac surgery team. Our data demonstrate the feasibility of the technique with excellent perioperative and midterm outcomes.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Stroke Volume , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, Left
7.
Anesth Analg ; 135(6): 1153-1158, 2022 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35051951

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial labor analgesia is associated with elevations in maternal temperature; the mechanism responsible is unknown. Proposed mechanisms have included infection, altered thermoregulation, and inflammation, potentially triggered by local anesthetics. Studies of the association between neuraxial labor analgesia and maternal fever have focused on epidural analgesia, and there have been no comparisons of the rate of maternal fever between continuous spinal and epidural labor analgesia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study to compare the rate of maternal fever between patients who received continuous spinal versus epidural labor analgesia between June 2012 and March 2020. Each patient who received continuous spinal analgesia was matched to 2 patients who received epidural analgesia and had the same nulliparous status. The primary outcome of our study was the incidence of intrapartum maternal fever, which we defined as any temperature ≥38 °C before delivery and compared between the continuous spinal and epidural groups using Fisher exact test. RESULTS: We identified 81 patients who received continuous spinal analgesia and 162 matched controls who received epidural analgesia. Demographic and obstetric characteristics of the patients were similar between groups. While the duration of analgesia did not significantly differ, there was markedly increased bupivacaine consumption in women with epidural analgesia. Eight of 81 (9.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1-18.3) women with continuous spinal analgesia developed an intrapartum fever compared to 18 of 162 (11.1%; 95% CI, 7.1-16.9) of women with epidural analgesia ( P = .83; Fisher exact test). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the rate of maternal fever between women with continuous spinal compared to epidural labor analgesia. While the route of administration and dose of bupivacaine differs between epidural and spinal labor analgesia, they are titrated to produce similar levels of neuraxial blockade. Our results are consistent with a model in which epidural related maternal fever is due to altered thermoregulation from a central neuraxial block and argue against a direct effect of bupivacaine or fentanyl, although we cannot rule out a concentration-independent effect of bupivacaine or fentanyl or an inflammatory effect of the catheter itself. These retrospective results highlight the importance of prospective and mechanistic study of neuraxial analgesia-related maternal fever.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Analgesia, Obstetrical , Labor, Obstetric , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Retrospective Studies , Analgesia, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Analgesia, Obstetrical/methods , Prospective Studies , Bupivacaine , Anesthetics, Local , Fentanyl , Fever/chemically induced , Fever/diagnosis , Fever/epidemiology
8.
Pharmacogenet Genomics ; 32(3): 79-86, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34570085

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Integration of pharmacogenomics into clinical care is being studied in multiple disciplines. We hypothesized that understanding attitudes and perceptions of anesthesiologists, critical care and pain medicine providers would uncover unique considerations for future implementation within perioperative care. METHODS: A survey (multiple choice and Likert-scale) was administered to providers within our Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care prior to initiation of a department-wide prospective pharmacogenomics implementation program. The survey addressed knowledge, perceptions, experiences, resources and barriers. RESULTS: Of 153 providers contacted, 149 (97%) completed the survey. Almost all providers (92%) said that genetic results influence drug therapy, and few (22%) were skeptical about the usefulness of pharmacogenomics. Despite this enthusiasm, 87% said their awareness about pharmacogenomic information is lacking. Feeling well-informed about pharmacogenomics was directly related to years in practice/experience: only 38% of trainees reported being well-informed, compared to 46% of those with 1-10 years of experience, and nearly two-thirds with 11+ years (P < 0.05). Regarding barriers, providers reported uncertainty about availability of testing, turnaround time and whether testing is worth financial costs. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiology, critical care and pain medicine providers are optimistic about the potential clinical utility of pharmacogenomics, but are uncertain about practical aspects of testing and desire clear guidelines on the use of results. These findings may inform future institutional efforts toward greater integration of genomic results to improve medication-related outcomes.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Anesthesiology , Humans , Perioperative Care , Pharmacogenetics/methods , Prospective Studies
10.
J Educ Perioper Med ; 23(4): E676, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34966829

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This prospective study investigated whether in-person interviews affected interviewer assessments of anesthesiology residency applicants at an academic medical center, and which applicant characteristics influenced interview performance. METHODS: Eighteen faculty members involved in residency recruitment between November 2019 and January 2020 documented preinterview (after full application review) and postinterview scores of the applicants on a scale of 1 to 5. Faculty also reported the relative contributions of specific interview characteristics (personality, physical appearance, professional demeanor, discussion regarding academic/scholarly activity, and level of interest in the specialty) to their postinterview assessments. Mixed-effects models were used to assess whether interviews changed faculty assessment of applicants, and what the relative contributions of applicant characteristics were to faculty assessments. RESULTS: A total of 696 interviews were conducted with 232 applicants. The postinterview scores differed significantly from the preinterview scores (estimated mean difference, 0.09 ± 0.02; P < 0.0001). The characteristics most affecting postinterview scores were positive impressions of applicants' personalities (marginal mean change in postinterview score, 0.259; 95% confidence interval, 0.221-0.297) and negative impressions of applicants' professional demeanor (marginal mean change, -0.257; 95% confidence interval, -0.350 to -0.164). CONCLUSIONS: In-person interviews significantly affected residency applicants' scores. Personality and professional demeanor influenced scores more than did other characteristics examined. Further studies are needed to clarify the relevance of in-person interviews to the assessment of residency applicants.

11.
Anesthesiology ; 135(5): 804-812, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34525169

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia staffing models rely on predictable surgical case volumes. Previous studies have found no relationship between month of the year and surgical volume. However, seasonal events and greater use of high-deductible health insurance plans may cause U.S. patients to schedule elective surgery later in the calendar year. The hypothesis was that elective anesthesia caseloads would be higher in December than in other months. METHODS: This review analyzed yearly adult case data in Florida and Texas locations of a multistate anesthesia practice from 2017 to 2019. To focus on elective caseload, the study excluded obstetric, weekend, and holiday cases. Time trend decomposition analysis was used with seasonal variation to assess differences between December and other months in daily caseload and their relationship to age and insurance subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 3,504,394 adult cases were included in the analyses. Overall, daily caseloads increased by 2.5 ± 0.1 cases per day across the 3-yr data set. After adjusting for time trends, the average daily December caseload in 2017 was 5,039 cases (95% CI, 4,900 to 5,177), a 20% increase over the January-to-November baseline (4,196 cases; 95% CI, 4,158 to 4,235; P < 0.0001). This increase was replicated in 2018: 5,567 cases in December (95% CI, 5,434 to 5,700) versus 4,589 cases at baseline (95% CI, 4,538 to 4,641), a 21.3% increase; and in 2019: 6,103 cases in December (95% CI, 5,871 to 6,334) versus 5,045 cases at baseline (95% CI, 4,984 to 5,107), a 21% increase (both P < 0.001). The proportion of commercially insured patients and those aged 18 to 64 yr was also higher in December than in other months. CONCLUSIONS: In this 3-yr retrospective analysis, it was observed that, after accounting for time trends, elective anesthesia caseloads were higher in December than in other months of the year. Proportions of commercially insured and younger patients were also higher in December. When compared to previous studies finding no increase, this pattern suggests a recent shift in elective surgical scheduling behavior.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/statistics & numerical data , Anesthesiology/statistics & numerical data , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Seasons , Workload/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Distribution , Florida , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Longitudinal Studies , Retrospective Studies , Texas
12.
Pharmacogenomics J ; 21(6): 691-711, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34376788

ABSTRACT

Variable responses to medications complicates perioperative care. As a potential solution, we evaluated and synthesized pharmacogenomic evidence that may inform anesthesia and pain prescribing to identify clinically actionable drug/gene pairs. Clinical decision-support (CDS) summaries were developed and were evaluated using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II. We found that 93/180 (51%) of commonly-used perioperative medications had some published pharmacogenomic information, with 18 having actionable evidence: celecoxib/diclofenac/flurbiprofen/ibuprofen/piroxicam/CYP2C9, codeine/oxycodone/tramadol CYP2D6, desflurane/enflurane/halothane/isoflurane/sevoflurane/succinylcholine/RYR1/CACNA1S, diazepam/CYP2C19, phenytoin/CYP2C9, succinylcholine/mivacurium/BCHE, and morphine/OPRM1. Novel CDS summaries were developed for these 18 medications. AGREE II mean ± standard deviation scores were high for Scope and Purpose (95.0 ± 2.8), Rigor of Development (93.2 ± 2.8), Clarity of Presentation (87.3 ± 3.0), and Applicability (86.5 ± 3.7) (maximum score = 100). Overall mean guideline quality score was 6.7 ± 0.2 (maximum score = 7). All summaries were recommended for clinical implementation. A critical mass of pharmacogenomic evidence exists for select medications commonly used in the perioperative setting, warranting prospective examination for clinical utility.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Anesthetics/therapeutic use , Decision Support Techniques , Perioperative Care , Pharmacogenetics , Pharmacogenomic Testing , Pharmacogenomic Variants , Analgesics/adverse effects , Anesthetics/adverse effects , Clinical Decision-Making , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
13.
Hypertension ; 78(4): 927-935, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34397272

ABSTRACT

Patients with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) suffer higher rates of long-term cardiovascular events including heart failure, coronary artery disease, and stroke. Cardiovascular changes during pregnancy can act as a natural stress test, subsequently unmasking latent cardiovascular disease in the form of HDP. Because HDP now affect 10% of pregnancies in the United States, the American Heart Association has called for physicians who provide peripartum care to promote early identification and cardiovascular risk reduction. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and outcomes of HDP-associated cardiovascular disease. In addition, we propose a multi-pronged approach to support cardiovascular risk reduction for women with a history of HDP. Additional research is warranted to define appropriate blood pressure targets in the postpartum period, optimize the use of pregnancy history in risk stratification tools, and clarify the effectiveness of preventive interventions. The highest rates of HDP are in populations with poor access to resources and quality health care, making it a major risk for inequity of care. Interventions to decrease long-term cardiovascular disease risk in women following HDP must also target disparity reduction.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/physiopathology , Cardiovascular Diseases/ethnology , Evidence-Based Practice , Female , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/ethnology , Postnatal Care , Pregnancy
14.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(5): e018526, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33619970

ABSTRACT

Background Preeclampsia is a prominent risk factor for long-term development of cardiovascular disease. Although existing studies report a strong correlation between preeclampsia and heart failure, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. One possibility is the glycoprotein growth factor activin A. During pregnancy, elevated activin A levels are associated with impaired cardiac global longitudinal strain at 1 year, but whether these changes persist beyond 1 year is not known. We hypothesized that activin A levels would remain increased more than 1 year after a preeclamptic pregnancy and correlate with impaired cardiac function. Methods and Results To test our hypothesis, we performed echocardiograms and measured activin A levels in women approximately 10 years after an uncomplicated pregnancy (n=25) or a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia (n=21). Compared with women with a previously normal pregnancy, women with preeclampsia had worse global longitudinal strain (-18.3% versus -21.3%, P=0.001), left ventricular posterior wall thickness (0.91 mm versus 0.80 mm, P=0.003), and interventricular septal thickness (0.96 mm versus 0.81 mm, P=0.0002). Women with preeclampsia also had higher levels of activin A (0.52 versus 0.37 ng/mL, P=0.02) and activin/follistatin-like 3 ratio (0.03 versus 0.02, P=0.04). In a multivariable model, the relationship between activin A levels and worsening global longitudinal strain persisted after adjusting for age at enrollment, mean arterial pressure, race, and body mass index (P=0.003). Conclusions Our findings suggest that both activin A levels and global longitudinal strain are elevated 10 years after a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. Future studies are needed to better understand the relationship between preeclampsia, activin A, and long-term cardiac function.


Subject(s)
Heart Diseases/etiology , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Myocardial Contraction/physiology , Postpartum Period/physiology , Pre-Eclampsia/physiopathology , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Activins/blood , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Echocardiography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Pre-Eclampsia/blood , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Pregnancy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
15.
J Intensive Care Med ; 36(7): 798-807, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32489132

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for pediatric postoperative respiratory failure and develop a predictive model. DESIGN: This retrospective case-control study utilized the US National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2012 to 2014. Significant predictors were selected, and the predicted probability of pediatric postoperative respiratory failure was calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were then calculated, and receiver-operator curves were drawn. SETTING: National Inpatient Sample data sets from years 2012, 2013, and 2014 were used. PATIENTS: Patients aged 17 and younger in the 2012, 2013, and 2014 NIS data sets. INTERVENTIONS: Candidate predictors included demographic variables, type of surgical procedure, a modified pediatric comorbidity score, presence of substance abuse diagnosis, and presence/absence of kyphoscoliosis. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was the pediatric quality indicator (PDI 09), which is defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research Quality, and identifies pediatric patients with postoperative respiratory failure. MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of pediatric postoperative respiratory failure in each year's data set varied from 1.31% in 2012 to 1.41% in 2014. Significant risk factors for the development of postoperative respiratory failure included abdominal surgery ([OR] = 1.92 in 2012 data set, 1.79 in 2013 data set), spine surgery (OR = 7.10 in 2012 data set, 6.41 in 2013 data set), and an elevated pediatric comorbidity score (score of 3 or greater: OR = 32.58 in 2012 data set, 22.74 in 2013 data set). A predictive model utilizing these risk factors achieved a C statistic of 0.82. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors associated with postoperative respiratory failure in pediatric patients undergoing noncardiac surgery include type of surgery (abdominal and spine) and higher pediatric comorbidity scores. A prediction model based on the identified factors had good predictive ability.


Subject(s)
Inpatients , Respiratory Insufficiency , Case-Control Studies , Child , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
16.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 155(2): 286-295, 2021 02 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33135049

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the Truvian Easy Check coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) IgM/IgG anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody test.Serologic assays have become increasingly available for surveillance through the Food and Drug Administration emergency use authorization in the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic. However, widespread application of serologic assays has been curbed by reports of faulty or inaccurate tests. Therefore, rapid COVID-19 antibody tests need to be thoroughly validated prior to their implementation. METHODS: The Easy Check device was analytically evaluated and its performance was compared with the Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay. The test was further characterized for cross-reactivity using sera obtained from patients infected by other viruses. Clinical performance was analyzed with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed samples and a 2015 prepandemic reference sample set. RESULTS: The Easy Check device showed excellent analytical performance and compares well with the Roche Elecsys antibody assay, with an overall concordance of 98.6%. Clinical performance showed a sensitivity of 96.6%, a specificity of 98.2%, and an overall accuracy of 98.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The Easy Check device is a simple, reliable, and rapid test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity, and its performance compares favorably against the automated Roche Elecsys antibody assay.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Serological Testing/instrumentation , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Cross Reactions , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Sensitivity and Specificity
17.
J Educ Perioper Med ; 22(2): E640, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32939368

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Wellness among resident physicians is important to their well-being and ability to provide clinical care. The relationship between physical activity and wellness among anesthesia residents has not yet been evaluated. We surveyed anesthesia residents to evaluate their levels of physical activity and self-perceived wellness scores. We hypothesized that residents with high self-reported physical activity levels would be more likely to have higher wellness scores. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-three anesthesia residents were invited to participate in this cross-sectional survey study. The survey included questions regarding demographics (age, gender, clinical anesthesia year, work hours), physical activity (based off the US Department of Health and Human Services [USDHHS] guidelines), and wellness (using the Satisfaction With Life Scale). The relationship between wellness and physical activity levels was evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one residents responded (43.6% response rate). Thirty-eight (27.1%) residents met our activity threshold for physically active. Eighty-six respondents (61.4%) were classified as having high wellness based on their survey answers. No significant associations were found between demographic data and wellness, including age or clinical anesthesia training year. Among those residents who described physical activity consistent with USDHHS guidelines, 29 (76.3%) had high wellness scores. After logistic regression analysis, residents who achieved the physical activity guidelines were more likely to have high wellness scores (odds ratio 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.13-6.20, P value .03). CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia resident physicians with high physical activity levels had higher self-perceived wellness scores.

18.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(12): e015997, 2020 06 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32495688

ABSTRACT

Background Approximately 60% of women have Stage B heart failure 1 year after a preeclamptic delivery. Emerging evidence suggests that the profibrotic growth factor activin A, which has been shown to induce cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy, is elevated in preeclampsia and may be inhibited by aspirin therapy. We hypothesized that preeclamptic women receiving aspirin would have lower activin A levels and reduced global longitudinal strain (GLS), a sensitive measure of cardiac dysfunction, than women who do not receive aspirin. To test our hypothesis, we performed a cohort study of women with preeclampsia or superimposed preeclampsia and compared activin A levels and GLS in parturients who did or did not receive aspirin. Methods and Results Ninety-two parturients were enrolled, of whom 25 (27%) received aspirin (81 mg/day) therapy. GLS, plasma activin A, and follistatin, which inactivates activin A, were measured. Women receiving aspirin therapy had lower median (interquartile range) levels of activin A (8.17 [3.70, 10.36] versus 12.77 [8.37, 31.25] ng/mL; P=0.001) and lower activin/follistatin ratio (0.59 [0.31, 0.93] versus 1.01 [0.64, 2.60] P=0.002) than women who did not receive aspirin, which also remained significant after multivariable analysis. Furthermore, GLS was worse in patients who did not receive aspirin (-19.84±2.50 versus -17.77±2.60%; P=0.03) despite no differences in blood pressure between groups. Conclusions Our study suggests that antepartum aspirin therapy reduced serum activin A levels and improved GLS in preeclamptic patients, suggesting that aspirin may mitigate the postpartum cardiac dysfunction seen in women with preeclampsia.


Subject(s)
Activins/blood , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Pre-Eclampsia/blood , Pre-Eclampsia/physiopathology , Prenatal Care , Ventricular Function, Left/drug effects , Adult , Aspirin/adverse effects , Biomarkers/blood , Down-Regulation , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follistatin/blood , Follistatin-Related Proteins/blood , Humans , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
19.
Anesth Analg ; 131(1): 55-60, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32221172

ABSTRACT

Since the first recognition of a cluster of novel respiratory viral infections in China in late December 2019, intensivists in the United States have watched with growing concern as infections with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus-now named coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19)-have spread to hospitals in the United States. Because COVID-19 is extremely transmissible and can progress to a severe form of respiratory failure, the potential to overwhelm available critical care resources is high and critical care management of COVID-19 patients has been thrust into the spotlight. COVID-19 arrived in the United States in January and, as anticipated, has dramatically increased the usage of critical care resources. Three of the hardest-hit cities have been Seattle, New York City, and Chicago with a combined total of over 14,000 cases as of March 23, 2020.In this special article, we describe initial clinical impressions of critical care of COVID-19 in these areas, with attention to clinical presentation, laboratory values, organ system effects, treatment strategies, and resource management. We highlight clinical observations that align with or differ from already published reports. These impressions represent only the early empiric experience of the authors and are not intended to serve as recommendations or guidelines for practice, but rather as a starting point for intensivists preparing to address COVID-19 when it arrives in their community.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Critical Care/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Chicago , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Critical Care/trends , Health Resources , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Laboratories , New York City , Pandemics , Personnel, Hospital , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Reference Values , Washington
20.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 34(5): 1198-1203, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31924509

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To systematically explore the relationship among the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), the timing of placement, and outcomes in pregnancy. DESIGN: Using the National Inpatient Sample and National Readmissions Database, the authors performed a retrospective, cohort analysis of peripartum women who received MCS. SETTING: United States hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A weighted sample of women who received MCS during the antepartum, delivery, or postpartum period between 2002 and 2014. INTERVENTIONS: MCS MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 1,386 women who received MCS during their admission. These women were older and had more comorbidities than women without MCS. The mean time from admission to device placement was 5.4 days for all women, and MCS use was highest in urban teaching hospitals. Overall, peripartum use of MCS has increased since 2002, but mortality did not change during the same period. After adjusting for potential confounders, the odds ratio for mortality when MCS was placed within 6 days of admission was 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.23-0.98) with the adjusted probability of death rising from 18.6% to 32.5% when the device was placed on or after day 6. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to trends in the general population, use of MCS has increased in the peripartum period. Women receiving MCS were generally older and had more comorbidities than those not receiving MCS. Increased time to device placement may worsen mortality. Further research will help identify appropriate candidates and factors that improve survival.


Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices , Peripartum Period , Female , Humans , Inpatients , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...